Boards Results

2020 MBC OAKWOOD CONGRESS SWISS TEAMS - MATCH 3

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -630

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

1 DUTTON Team 14 VALENTINE Team 4 E 11 650 -1 1

2 PACKER Team 6 HAN Team 4 E 11 650 0 0

3 HOLMAN Team 8 BIEGANSKI Team 4 E 9 100 12 -12

4 MUNRO Team 7 BROOKS Team 4 E 11 650 -1 1

5 BELONOGOFF Team 15 SONGERWALA Team 4 E 11 650 -1 1

6 HAN Team 2 PACKER Team 4 E 11 650 0 0

7 BROOKS Team 4 MUNRO Team 4 E 10 620 1 -1

8 BIEGANSKI Team 3 HOLMAN Team 4 E 10 620 -12 12

9 BROOME Team 16 MATTHEWS Team 4 E 10 620 0 0

10 ZOTTI Team 24 GOODMAN Team 4 E 10 620 0 0

11 HENDERSON Team 13 HAVAS Team 4 E 10 620 0 0

12 MCNEILL Team 21 TOFT Team 4 E 11 650 -1 1

13 HAVAS Team 11 HENDERSON Team 4 E 10 620 0 0

14 VALENTINE Team 1 DUTTON Team 4 E 10 620 1 -1

15 SONGERWALA Team 5 BELONOGOFF Team 4 E 10 620 1 -1

16 MATTHEWS Team 9 BROOME Team 4 E 10 620 0 0

17 FRAMPTON Team 20 Yusof Team 4 E 11 650 -1 1

18 STEED Team 23 WONGPHASUKCHOT Team 4 E 10 620 0 0

19 DANIEL Team 25 MATSUMURA Team 3NT W 9 600 1 -1

20 Yusof Team 17 FRAMPTON Team 4 E 10 620 1 -1

21 TOFT Team 12 MCNEILL Team 4 E 10 620 1 -1

22 DEAN Team 26 House Team 4 E 11 650 -1 1

23 WONGPHASUKCHOT Team 18 STEED Team 4 E 10 620 0 0

24 GOODMAN Team 10 ZOTTI Team 4 E 10 620 0 0

25 MATSUMURA Team 19 DANIEL Team 4 E 10 620 -1 1

26 House Team 22 DEAN Team 4 E 10 620 1 -1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -1 100 1
3NT by EW = -600 1
4 by EW = -620 16
4 by EW +1 -650 8

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 DUTTON Team	14 VALENTINE Team	4 E		11		650	-1	1
2 PACKER Team	6 HAN Team	4 E		11		650	0	0
3 HOLMAN Team	8 BIEGANSKI Team	4 E		9	100		12	-12
4 MUNRO Team	7 BROOKS Team	4 E		11		650	-1	1
5 BELONOGOFF Team	15 SONGERWALA Team	4 E		11		650	-1	1
6 HAN Team	2 PACKER Team	4 E		11		650	0	0
7 BROOKS Team	4 MUNRO Team	4 E		10		620	1	-1
8 BIEGANSKI Team	3 HOLMAN Team	4 E		10		620	-12	12
9 BROOME Team	16 MATTHEWS Team	4 E		10		620	0	0
10 ZOTTI Team	24 GOODMAN Team	4 E		10		620	0	0
11 HENDERSON Team	13 HAVAS Team	4 E		10		620	0	0
12 MCNEILL Team	21 TOFT Team	4 E		11		650	-1	1
13 HAVAS Team	11 HENDERSON Team	4 E		10		620	0	0
14 VALENTINE Team	1 DUTTON Team	4 E		10		620	1	-1
15 SONGERWALA Team	5 BELONOGOFF Team	4 E		10		620	1	-1
16 MATTHEWS Team	9 BROOME Team	4 E		10		620	0	0
17 FRAMPTON Team	20 Yusof Team	4 E		11		650	-1	1
18 STEED Team	23 WONGPHASUKCHOT Team	4 E		10		620	0	0
19 DANIEL Team	25 MATSUMURA Team	3NT W		9		600	1	-1
20 Yusof Team	17 FRAMPTON Team	4 E		10		620	1	-1
21 TOFT Team	12 MCNEILL Team	4 E		10		620	1	-1
22 DEAN Team	26 House Team	4 E		11		650	-1	1
23 WONGPHASUKCHOT Team	18 STEED Team	4 E		10		620	0	0
24 GOODMAN Team	10 ZOTTI Team	4 E		10		620	0	0
25 MATSUMURA Team	19 DANIEL Team	4 E		10		620	-1	1
26 House Team	22 DEAN Team	4 E		10		620	1	-1

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-1	100	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	1
4 by EW	=	-620	16
4 by EW	+1	-650	8